Clear all

3 results found

reorder grid_view

Captured Childhood

March 21, 2012

Over the past two years, the International Detention Coalition (IDC) has heard first-hand the stories of children and parents from all over the world who have experienced or been impacted by immigration detention. One such story follows-Dakarai was working on a farm in South Africa....He was arrested because he didn't have the right papers. Adults and children were detained together... More than 300 people were there at the time. 'Sometimes we were sleeping on the floor without blankets, we were staying there for a long time because they were telling us there was no transport to Zimbabwe to deport us. We stayed there for a whole month. The building was made from iron sheets and the food was also another problem, we only received one meal a day, just bread, sometimes with soup... there was nothing to do in the detention centre: no toys, ball or place to play... ' Dakarai became ill in detention so the authorities took him to hospital. After receiving some treatment, he was released, but had nowhere to go. He slept on the streets. Dakari from Zimbabwe, detained in South Africa, aged 15.Consistent with the Convention on the Rights of the Child and in response to this research, the IDC has written which conveys the stories of these children who have been in immigration detention. Their experiences highlight the need for alternative approaches to managing the irregular migration of children.

There Are Alternatives: A Handbook for Preventing Unnecessary Immigration Detention

December 5, 2011

Examines concerns about the use of immigration detention and introduces the Community Assessment and Placement model, which combines mechanisms that prevent unnecessary detention and community management models, including case management and monitoring.

There are Alternatives: A Handbook for Preventing Unnecessary Immigration Retention

April 23, 2011

This research came about in response to the growing interest of governments and other stakeholders around the world in finding reliable, cost-effective and humane ways of managing asylum seekers, refugees and irregular migrants without the financial and human costs that detention incurs. Immigration detention is a growing phenomenon of modern governance as governments strive to regulate growing cross-border migration and limit the number of migrants who do not have legal status on their territory. Detention capacity continues to expand despite well established concerns that detention does not deter irregular migrants and asylum seekers; that it interferes with human rights; and that it is known to harm the health and well-being of detainees. Notwithstanding this trend, when we take an international perspective and compare existing migration policy and practice across different contexts, we find that most countries do not use detention as the first option in the majority of cases; that a number of countries rarely resort to immigration detention, if at all; and that successful migration systems break down the population before considering management or placement options. This international perspective allows us to take into account the extensive systems in operation designed to work with a range of migrants in a community setting while a migration issue is being resolved. The aim of this research was to identify and describe examples of community-based alternatives to immigration detention. For the purposes of this research, 'alternatives to immigration detention' include any legislation, policy or practice that allows for asylum seekers, refugees and migrants to reside in the community with freedom of movement while their migration status is being resolved or while awaiting deportation or removal from the country. Our specific objectives were to:* Identify the policy objectives underlying the use of immigration detention.* Identify key examples in the management of asylum seekers, refugees and migrants that fulfill these policy objectives outside of detention.* Identify the range of alternatives to detention that are currently operating internationally, and describe in detail key examples in various contexts/regions, including examples with vulnerable populations.* Describe the role of governments and their institutions in creating and implementing alternatives to detention. * Describe the role of non-governmental organisations and civil society in creating and sustaining the use of alternatives to detention. * Describe the immigration outcomes and cost benefits where known.* Explore the factors that are regarded as contributing to the effectiveness of community-based alternatives to detention