Clear all

3 results found

reorder grid_view

The Big Picture 2: Public Expenditure on Artistic, Cultural and Creative activity in Australia in 2007-08 to 2019-20

February 6, 2022

The 2019–20 financial year included both significant bushfires and the first four months of the Covid-19 pandemic. While Covid-19 dominates our every thought and every policy today, it is important to remember that this was not the case for most of the 2019–20 period. This report provides an updated overview of cultural expenditure trends in Australia between the 2007–08 and 2019–20 periods, drawing on a new release of Australia's most comprehensive dataset on cultural funding by governments. It builds on the initial observations about this release, which ANA published in October 2021.

Where the Money Goes: Private Wealth for Public Good

July 1, 2013

With this report, Gina Anderson offers a glimpse into the world of Australian philanthropy through the prism of 12 major philanthropic foundations. The report complements the work of the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission in its efforts to promote accountability through regulation and mandatory information disclosure. When it comes to transparency, however, regulation and compulsion are no substitute for a willingness on the part of philanthropic foundations to invite public scrutiny by voluntarily sharing their data and metrics. The report marks a major commitment on the part of 12 leading private foundations toward greater transparency, data gathering, and evidence-based reporting of grants and programs, and in so doing establishes their pioneering leadership in this important initiative.

There are Alternatives: A Handbook for Preventing Unnecessary Immigration Retention

April 23, 2011

This research came about in response to the growing interest of governments and other stakeholders around the world in finding reliable, cost-effective and humane ways of managing asylum seekers, refugees and irregular migrants without the financial and human costs that detention incurs. Immigration detention is a growing phenomenon of modern governance as governments strive to regulate growing cross-border migration and limit the number of migrants who do not have legal status on their territory. Detention capacity continues to expand despite well established concerns that detention does not deter irregular migrants and asylum seekers; that it interferes with human rights; and that it is known to harm the health and well-being of detainees. Notwithstanding this trend, when we take an international perspective and compare existing migration policy and practice across different contexts, we find that most countries do not use detention as the first option in the majority of cases; that a number of countries rarely resort to immigration detention, if at all; and that successful migration systems break down the population before considering management or placement options. This international perspective allows us to take into account the extensive systems in operation designed to work with a range of migrants in a community setting while a migration issue is being resolved. The aim of this research was to identify and describe examples of community-based alternatives to immigration detention. For the purposes of this research, 'alternatives to immigration detention' include any legislation, policy or practice that allows for asylum seekers, refugees and migrants to reside in the community with freedom of movement while their migration status is being resolved or while awaiting deportation or removal from the country. Our specific objectives were to:* Identify the policy objectives underlying the use of immigration detention.* Identify key examples in the management of asylum seekers, refugees and migrants that fulfill these policy objectives outside of detention.* Identify the range of alternatives to detention that are currently operating internationally, and describe in detail key examples in various contexts/regions, including examples with vulnerable populations.* Describe the role of governments and their institutions in creating and implementing alternatives to detention. * Describe the role of non-governmental organisations and civil society in creating and sustaining the use of alternatives to detention. * Describe the immigration outcomes and cost benefits where known.* Explore the factors that are regarded as contributing to the effectiveness of community-based alternatives to detention